|
1995 - 2008 |
|||
|
Compiled
by
Trevor Poulton of ALP Otway Ranges Interest Group (ALP ORIG) October
2008 In fulfilment
of the state Labor government’s election policy, Forests
and National Parks (2002),
parliament
passed legislation on
The
policy provided for a timeframe for ending logging
outside of the new national park, not based on a transition to
plantations
which would have taken decades, but on the expiry of hardwood timber
logging
licences by June 2008. The Otways
forest
policy represented a wonderful win for the public and for the
environment
movement. The time was historically ripe for the forest policy
statement which
not only addressed the Otways, but also promised an end to wood
chipping in Since the
commencement in 1995 of the Commonwealth-State Regional Forest
Agreement
process, the Otways had become a logical flash point for the
environment
movement to challenge the state government’s ecological forest
management
credentials - the Otways is close to Melbourne, the area is
internationally
recognised for its natural assets, it brings in over a billion dollars
per
annum through tourism, and its water supply catchments service over a
quarter
of a million people. Ending native forest logging in the Otways:
Chronology of Key Events 1995-2008 is intended
to capture key events of the
campaign. Geelong
Environment Council Inc boosted community passion for saving the Otway
forests
with its Proposal
for the Extension of the Otway National Park (1995) to increase protection for the
region’s cool temperate
rainforest, wet sclerophyll forest and a whole range of habitat for the
Tiger
Quoll, Yellow-Tailed Black Cockatoo, Powerful Owl, Australian King
Parrot,
River Blackfish and the list goes on. The Otway Ranges Walking Track
Association encapsulated tourism potential of the Otway Ranges beyond
the Great
Ocean Road with its proposed Trans-Otway
Walk leading to ten
waterfalls, and weaving
its way through rainforest and magnificent valley forest in the
Mid-Cumberland,
Kennett, Carisbrook, Upper Smythes and Wild Dog
Valleys, connecting
Lorne to Apollo Bay by foot. Politically
inspired groups such as the Otway Ranges Environment Network (OREN) and
Geelong
Community Forum (GCF) mobilised to highlight deficiencies in the
Department for
Natural Resources and Environment’s (DNRE, now DSE) forest management
practices
and policies that put the interests of the timber industry above that
of many other
stakeholders including conservation groups, tourism operators and water
catchment authorities. They impressed local government with
presentations at
council meetings leading to several councils in the Geelong-Colac
region passing
motions reflecting concern over clearfell logging, particularly in the
water
catchments. Direct action
groups such as Future Rescue bravely confronted the machinery of the
timber
industry, drawing media attention to the devastating impacts of
industrial
logging. The Department was continually being frustrated by aerial forest
blockades using ropes, platforms, pulleys, and climbing equipment,
sometimes creating
tree villages in the canopy. Doctors for
Native Forests contributed with picnic tours of forest areas, as well
as constructing
walking tracks and obstinately
re-constructing them after they had been undone by the Department. Small
business in
towns and hamlets along the Political
groups
such as the Australian Democracts and the Greens Party mobilised with
regular media
releases and election policies to protect the Otways. Liberals for
Forests
stood candidates at State and Federal elections to give prominence to
the issue
amongst conservative voters. The Labor
Party,
which took government from the Liberals in 1999, also found itself
under
intense internal pressure from grassroots members, with the
establishment of the
ALP Otway Ranges Interest Group (ALP ORIG). The group’s stated
objective was to
end logging of the Otways by 2002. ALP ORIG garnered support for the
campaign by
getting up motions at 30 ALP Branches calling for an end to clearfell
logging
of the Otways, participated on ALP policy committees, courted factions
within
the party, and consulted with affiliated unions such as the Electrical
Trades
Union, politicians and ministerial advisers. It drafted the Otways
Hydrology
Study policy which was embraced during the 1999 state election by a
victorious
Labor Party. It
commissioned the Saulwick &
Associates Poll which
pointed out to the government that 69% of people in south-west ALP ORIG
worked
closely with environment groups and in the process developed a Common Base Position Statement in
February 2002 which provided a framework for ending logging in the
Otways.
Importantly, the framework clarified
for the government how logging could be brought to an end in the Otways
without
negating the West Victoria Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) (to be
distinguished
from the Greens campaign of ‘RFA No Way’).
The
chronology brings to light contributions of professional journalists
such as Claire Miller, the then Environment Reporter for The
Age, whose articles provided to the public of Victoria a
dramatic narrative of the battles down on the south-west coast and the
reactions of the government and the timber industry. The series of
articles now
stand as an invaluable testament as to what happened back then. Whilst the
chronology does acknowledge support leant to the campaign by
some Labor Members of Parliament, in reality MPs tended to be
relatively
missing in action, having failed to bind together in any form within
the
parliamentary wing to amplify community concerns. Predictably, it was
Labor
MPs, a number of whom actually opposed ending logging of the Otways,
who became
electoral beneficiaries. There
were notable differences in strategies and objectives
that characterised the conduct of various groups, and in that regard,
there may
be lessons for future campaigns. In particular, in the opinion of the
writer,
OREN changed its course after the Premier Steve Bracks signed the West
Victoria
RFA in 2000. OREN had been a local brand name for the movement to end
logging
in the Otways and was particularly respected for it research and series
of
reports critiquing DSE’s policies and operations. However, OREN became
progressively
negotiable with Minister for Environment’s Office and made several
offers to not endorse Direct Action
by protesters
in exchange for the Department not logging contentious coupes that OREN
had
identified. These dealings could have alienated the movement, and
seemed
farcical since they did not procure any substantive commitments by the
state
government to end logging. Further, the Department continued to chainsaw its way through OREN’s list of
contentious coupes. In
February 2002, the state election year, Minister Garbutt
publically claimed that her office had entered into a ‘peace deal’ with
OREN,
as if the war was over. However, the Minister’s claim of a ‘peace deal’
during
the election year was illusory. Community groups, environment groups,
the
Democrats and Greens Party, ALP Otway Ranges Interest Group and
residents
persisted with direct action in coupes such as Dunse Track, endorsed
the Common Base Position Statement,
joined
the Rally For Our Forests outside
the
May 2002 ALP State Conference and lobbied on all political levels in
the lead
up to the election to maximise pressure on the government for immediate
reform.
The
Bracks government’s Otways announcement was a political
response to an accumulation of efforts by a broad range of
stakeholders. In
that regard, it also ought not to be forgotten that OREN’s agitation,
regular
reporting of events through its website, and persistent dialogue with
the
government remained extremely important for helping to keep the issue
on the
political and public agenda. The
specific political trigger for the Otways announcement related
to the fact that the Labor Party was a minority government and needed
to secure
its inner The
policy proved, after many exhausting and sometimes
bloody battles, to be an electoral gift from the public to the
incumbent
government. Status of the The
Otways legislation was passed
despite terms contained in the West Victoria Regional Forest Agreement
that,
for example, provide that with any changes in the timber harvesting
area there
must not be a net deterioration in the timber capacity of the forest. Whilst
the
Otway
Ranges Environment Network (OREN)
maintains on its website that the Otways/OREN
campaign ‘destroyed the Regional Forest
Agreement
process’ and that ‘former
Premier Bracks is the only State Premier to ever have cancelled a
Regional
Forest Agreement in its entirety anywhere in Australia!!',
the reality is that the West Victoria RFA remains
intact. Regional
Forest Agreements were structured to abrogate the Federal government
from its obligations to regulate the native
timber forestry under Commonwealth acts such the
Environment
Protection and Biodiversity Conservation
Act 1999 (Cwth), Environment Protection (Impact of Proposals)
Act 1974, Endangered Species
Protection Act 1992 (Cwth) and the Export Control Act, and
regulations such as the Export Control
(Unprocessed Wood) Regulations (Cwth)
and Export Control (Hardwood
Wood
Chips) Regulations (Cwth).
If the
West Victoria RFA has been cancelled then these Commonwealth acts and
regulations
would once again apply to the West Victoria region, in particular in
relation
to the burgeoning hardwood plantation estate (including leased crown
land), and
management of continued hardwood logging in the Midlands Forest
Management
Area. The
Otways election announcement
constituted a possible breach of the West Victoria RFA by the state
government.
However, the Federal government has not, and would not have any
interest in using
that breach to terminate the agreement under the termination clauses in
the
RFA. Further,
the writer suggests that the
state government could perhaps argue that whilst it may have breached
some
terms of the RFA agreement, it had merely adopted recommendation 16 of
the Evaluation
of Data and Methods for Estimating the Sustainable Yield of Sawlogs in
Victoria
(Expert
Data Reference Group, 2001) by
‘applying
the optimal harvesting rate that delivers the greatest benefit to
stakeholders’,
which in the case of the Otways Forest Management Area had been deemed
to be a
sustainable logging yield of 0%. Rather
than dismissing the RFA as an irrelevancy, a
challenge for environment groups is to ascertain the remaining
obligations that
the State government is yet to and/or must still comply with under the
West
Victoria RFA for ecologically sustainable management of its native
forests, as
well as for regulating plantation forestry operations. Key events: The
chronology is intended to capture key
events to give the reader an insight into the dynamics of the campaign.
It has
largely avoided delving into the forest politics of other regions but
does make
some references to conduct of organisations such as the Australian
Conservation
Council (ACF) and The Wilderness Society (TWS) with their regards
strategies
that impacted on all the forest campaigns at the times - in particular,
their
support of the State government to establish VicForest as a state-owned
corporation for public forestry (a form of privatisation), and TWS’s
initiating
of a Writ in the Supreme Court against the CFMEU that virtually
destroyed any
opportunity for environment groups to develop an alliance with green
unions
through Earthworker. The
chronology has been drafted by the writer
from his extensive cabinet of documents and computer files as well as
through
some Googling. However, the writer
is
more than happy to amend any factual errors or misinterpretations, and
include other
key events which may be brought to his attention by the reader, and
which can
only add to the document’s usefulness. The
chronology includes hyperlinks for
readers who might want a more in depth understanding of the issues or
confirm
the accuracy of the writer’s entries. The links can also be accessed in
the box
on the home page of the website. Trevor Poulton ALP
Otway Ranges Interest Group (ALP ORIG)
Defining, Identifying and Protecting Old-growth Forest in Victoria ARCHIVES Clearfell logging involves the broad scale clearing of forest areas and has a dramatic impact on the landscape. According to the September 2001 Saulwick poll A Quantitative Study of Corangamite Voter Attitudes (commissioned by ALP Otway Ranges Interest Group), 69% of all electors in Corangamite oppose the clearfelling of native forests in the Otways. The State ALP can shift the voting patterns of a significant proportion of swinging voters by ending clearfell logging in the Otways. This can be achieved under the terms of the Federal-State West Victoria Regional Forest Agreement and the Forest Act 1958. THREE POLITICAL STEPS 1) The Victorian State Government commits to ending clearfell logging in the Otways as at 30 June 2002 2) The Victorian State Government:
(b) ends the annual renewal of Residual
log allocations, which allow for the exploitation of the Otways for
woodchips, as at 30 June 2002.
Mt Sabine Falls - temporarily reprieved from logging through the actions of ALP Otway Ranges Interest Group and Community Groups READ ABOUT ALP OTWAY RANGES INTEREST GROUP Contacts for the Otway Ranges
Interest Group "The ALP is in
power -
|